Tonal Membership Controversy: What Really Happens When You Turn It Off?
A frustrated Tonal owner exposes what they claim is misleading marketing about membership-free features, while also criticizing popular reviewer Paul Sklar's Tonal 2 review for allegedly missing key limitations.
The Smart Home Gym Dilemma
Smart home fitness equipment has transformed how we work out at home. But as these devices become more sophisticated, so too do their business models. Tonal, the AI-powered strength training system, has been at the forefront of this revolution—but also at the center of a growing controversy.
A recent viral reaction video has shed light on what many owners are discovering: the line between product and subscription may be blurrier than advertised.
The Membership Question
At the heart of the controversy is a simple question: What do you actually get when you turn off your Tonal membership?
According to the video's narrator—a frustrated Tonal owner who turned off their membership as both a protest and a test—the answer may surprise potential buyers.
Here's what the owner claims happens when membership is disabled:
- Manual weight adjustment only—no automatic resistance
- No eccentric control—the smart deceleration feature disappears
- No movement tracking—your reps and sets go unrecorded
- No weight tracking—progress data is inaccessible
- Essentially a dumbbell rack—with handles, bar, and rope, but nothing smart
The Website Discrepancy
The owner claims that Tonal's website currently displays misleading information about membership-free features. A checkbox option suggests users get "access to all your moves" without a subscription—but the reality, according to this hands-on test, tells a different story.
"That's what this device is like with it turned off," the narrator states. "I have no eccentric. I have no nothing."
Paul Sklar's Review Under Fire
The controversy extends to popular fitness reviewer Paul Sklar, who recently reviewed the Tonal 2. According to the video's narrator, Sklar made a claim that couldn't be further from the truth:
"I can turn off the membership because I do all my own custom workouts."
The narrator pushes back hard on this assertion:
"No, you can't, Paul. This is what you get. You don't get the ability to track movements. You don't get the ability to track your weights. You don't get the ability to track your sets and reps. You don't get anything if you turn it off."
The Review Unit Question
Perhaps the most damning allegation in the video addresses the elephant in the room: review unit bias.
The narrator claims that Sklar—like many tech reviewers—received a Tonal with the membership already paid for by the company. This, they argue, creates a fundamental conflict of interest:
- Reviewers can't test the membership-free experience
- They can't report on what happens when the subscription lapses
- They inadvertently validate features they've never actually used in "free" mode
"Paul, you wouldn't know because your device was paid for and you don't even have the ability to turn off the membership on your device because they pay the membership for you, Paul."
The narrator's conclusion is blunt: "Which is what they do for all these review units that go out. The memberships are paid for by Tonal. Why do you think they don't get terrible reviews across the board?"
The "Steelback" Program
Adding fuel to the fire is Tonal's buyback program, which the narrator dubs the "steelback program"—a reference to the perceived difficulty of recouping your investment.
According to the video, it was the combination of this buyback program AND the review coverage that finally pushed the narrator to cancel their membership entirely:
"Like that buyback program which I call the steelback program plus Paul Sklar's absolutely disgusting review of this Tonal 2 where he had the nerve to say I can turn off the membership... made me turn off the membership. That's when I said enough is enough."
What This Means for Buyers
This controversy raises critical questions for anyone considering a Tonal purchase:
1. The True Cost of Ownership
If the device loses most of its functionality without membership, buyers are essentially purchasing a subscription service with hardware attached—not just a piece of equipment.
2. Transparency in Marketing
Consumers deserve clear, accurate information about what features require ongoing payment. Checkbox claims that don't match reality erode trust.
3. Review Integrity
When companies pay for review units' ongoing costs, can reviews truly be objective? This case highlights the importance of reviewers disclosing such arrangements—and ideally, testing all product states themselves.
The Bigger Picture
This isn't just about Tonal. It's about a broader shift in fitness technology toward subscription-dependent functionality. Smart mirrors, connected bikes, AI trainers—they all follow similar models.
But Tonal's case is particularly striking because of the hardware investment required. We're not talking about a $20/month app subscription. We're talking about thousands of dollars in equipment that may become significantly less valuable without ongoing payment.
What's Next?
As of this writing, Tonal has not publicly responded to these specific claims. The video has generated significant discussion in fitness tech communities, with many owners sharing their own experiences with membership cancellation.
For potential buyers, the lesson is clear: understand the full cost of ownership before purchasing smart home gym equipment. Ask questions. Read between the lines. And remember that a shiny review may not tell the whole story.
What do you think about subscription-dependent smart fitness equipment? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Related Posts
Speediance 2S First Look: Is the 260 lb Upgrade Worth Double the Price?
Speediance 2S vs Original: Real User Review After 600,000+ lbs Lifted